The Greens have no credibility with the people ( I rep in 150) and yet they reckon they have a right to hold up the desires of the other 149.
N Ferguson suggests, as history shows, that a single moral imperative can lead to tyranny over implementing that imperative .Its not the theoretical imperative that most practical scientists are concerned about - its the preoccupation of most wannabes with their OWN ways of doing things. The greatest evil has always been done in the name of the best intention.
It's the deep lack of Greens and associated idealists ability and commitment to workable solutions that most frightens those of us who tried to advise them
PERSPECTIVE
It doesn't look good for those in the country . Our ageing farmers are already at war with those who would tell them what to do . Having an RSPCA vet is something farmers support but what will a Senator/s dedicated to rid industry of anything they think cruel means ? How close to vegan culture will they insist we go ? How much frustration can the House of reps face before all the good people leave to do more productive things ?
Are we heading, like America towards leadership by TRUMPS? --To a dysfunctional parliament
The Senate is meant to ensure small voices get heard . Many of the true independents do that , To use the Senate as a de facto power base for a major party is plain wrong .
In July, the adults must insist that only those committed to competence should have voting power .
We love our children's passion but we would be mad to put them in charge of our household .But that's what we have done. JULY 2 is time to change that
.
The Greens reckon they have the best interests of the other 149 in mind .
Like some noisy teenagers, the Greens have good intentions. But they also have more than their fair share of inexperience , ignorance and the arrogance that should prevent them taking office.
The age may well be renamed the age of the windbag.
We must be mad if we don't remove many of them from the Senate in July -Yet the opposite looks like happening .
Ignorance and arrogance
- They say they're the only ones who care when they are not .
- When they are game enough to talk action, they claim competence when the competent in environment call them plain careless.
-Greens do a lot of talking, especially now they sit there on mass in the Senate and block decisions. That's what you do when you don't know what to do.You sit, talk, ctiticize and monitor .
High minded talk is fine in its places, but our houses have business to DO .
What do the greens think we should DO about coal bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef . We need to know if 500 million dollars offered by Labor would meet their stringent oversight.
Green Actions so far this election . ( apart from 2 degree talk and closing down industry- so normal)
Di Natalie does not have the wisdom of experience to realise that the only people who follow him don't want lollies here on earth . He doesn't need to lower his game like he did the other day when he talked about a tax on food to help farmers . .
He doesn't need to solve our farmers problems - he doesn't need to settle down superannuation speculation or deal with bleaching coral . Dicks copy book is all white - Why blot it with testable local solutions? He's really too busy solving the world problems .
Whether we like it or not we must choose a team with a bit of know how - feet on the ground stuff .
We love our children's passion but we would be mad to put them in charge of our household .But that's what we have now . The Green dominance of the Senate is not only their problem but our problem ( in not voting more carefully)
The major political parties may struggle to be credible on the environment , but at least they work as a team and talk to and are accountable to real people with their feet on the ground.
The Greens sit there blocking things and playing blocking games ---- and its got to stop
REject their plain power game wich turns out to be Stalemate .
No votes for them in the Senate
No comments:
Post a Comment